Læs også min WEBLOG "Info-BLOG'en" med nyheder Tilbage til "Artikeloversigt" |
|
USA & Japan - 60 år efter Hiroshima & Nagasaki:By any means necessary: the United States and JapanPaul Rogers, 4. august 2005 If Hiroshima and Nagasaki had not worked, the United States had a plan for winning the war against Japan that involved massive use of chemical weapons. The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945
remains a focus of historical controversy even sixty years later. Until the
1970s, most historians accepted the view that the weapons were used to prevent
the need for an American invasion of the Japanese mainland scheduled to start in
November 1945. Subsequently, “revisionist” critics argued
that there were other motives, not least the need to bring the war to an early
end because of the rise of Soviet influence in the region. In this view,
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were early shots in the cold war, at a time when Japan
was actually close to surrender. A later generation of historians argued that the release of previously secret
intelligence material dating from early 1945 establishes that Japan was not
ready to surrender, and that its army planned to defend the homeland so
formidably, and at such cost to American invaders, that Japan could force a
ceasefire on favourable terms (see Richard B Frank, "Why Truman Dropped the
Bomb", Weekly Standard, 8
August 2005). The arguments and counter-arguments will not easily be concluded, and it is
certainly the case that the United States was prepared to continue the use of
atomic weapons against Japanese cities until surrender was forced; the Manhattan
Project was thought to be capable of producing two more atom bombs a month
through to the end of 1945. In the event, the formal
Japanese surrender on 2 September 1945 brought the war to an end without
further nuclear attacks. But what would have happened if the Manhattan Project had not had its effect
and the United States’s projected invasion of Japan had indeed gone ahead? The
sudden end of the war precipitated by the two atomic bombs, and subsequent
secrecy on the part of the United States, disguised for many years the fact that
the US had prepared a remarkable back-up plan. This was the mass-production of
enormous quantities of chemical weapons to be used against Japanese cities, that
envisaged killing as many as 5 million people. This previously secret plan came to light with the declassification of
sensitive papers after the end of the cold war, and was written up some years
later in a paper for the authoritative Proceedings
of the US Naval Institute by two military historians, Norman Polmar
& Thomas B Allen ("The Most Deadly Plan", Proceedings, January
1998). It scarcely reached the public domain at the time, yet it says much about the
approach to warfare that had developed by 1945, including a willingness to
inflict mass civilian casualties on a scale far higher even than the
carpet-bombing of Tokyo,
Hamburg or Dresden or the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A chemical blitz As the war in Europe was being fought to a bitter end during the winter of
1944-45, there was still uncertainty that the Manhattan Project would succeed in
its aim of producing atomic weapons. By early 1945, plans were already underway
for an American invasion of the Japanese mainland, “Operation
Olympic” (the first part of the wider “Operation
Downfall”), which was to start with the southern island of Kyushu. The high American death toll in the much smaller invasions of the Marianas,
Iwo Jima, Okinawa and elsewhere led the US army's Chemical
Warfare Service to devise a plan to use massive chemical weapon attacks to
support the invasion of the mainland. The details
were contained in A Study of the Possible Use of Toxic Gas in Operation
Olympic, an anodyne title for an extraordinary proposal that involved two
different if almost simultaneous uses for thousands of tons of chemical weapons.
The main weapons to be used were two chemical blister agents, phosgene and
mustard gas, together with hydrogen cyanide and cyanogen chloride. At the time of the invasion itself, tactical strike aircraft would drop
nearly 9,000 tons of chemical weapons on the defending troops in the first
fifteen days, with further attacks planned at the rate of just under 5,000 tons
every thirty days from then on. As US troops came ashore, they would bring in
howitzers and mortars that could deliver an additional forty-five tons a day of
poisonous gas on Japanese positions. This represented a massive use of chemical weapons, but it was dwarfed in
scale by the proposed attacks on Japanese cities. In what the document described
as an "initial gas blitz", long-range B-29 and B-24 strategic bombers
would attack a large number of cities across Japan – starting with Tokyo,
fifteen days before the ground invasion started. Over the next, initial
fifteen-day period, over 56,000 tons of gas bombs would be dropped on cities,
followed by almost 24,000 tons of gas bombs dropped every month from then on
until the war ended or all the planned targets had been hit. Although this plan
was completed only in June 1945, it originated in work started by the Chemical
Warfare Service more than eighteen months earlier; as early as April 1944, a
detailed study – Selected Aerial Objectives for Retaliatory Gas Attacks on
Japan – had been completed assessing the vulnerability of cities such as
Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka to gas attack. The analysts believed that their densely
populated residential areas, with narrow streets and few open spaces, were
particularly susceptible to chemical warfare. Moreover, mustard gas is readily
absorbed by wood, and Japanese wooden houses would have been very difficult to
decontaminate. The intention was to maximise
casualties, mostly civilian, and the study stated: "The Gas Attack Program is aimed primarily at causing the maximum number of casualties, crippling transportation and public services, complicating and delaying the repair of HE [high explosive] bomb damage and making targets more vulnerable to incendiary attack." By June 1945, the full gas-attack plan was submitted to Major
General William N Porter, head of the Chemical Warfare Service, detailing
fifty urban and industrial targets, including twenty-five cities that were
particularly susceptible to gas attack. According to the report, "Gas
attacks of the size and intensity recommended on these 250 square miles of urban
population … might easily kill 5,000,000 people and injure that many
more." The chemical warfare attacks were never implemented, but the programme was in
no sense theoretical. While the plans were being formulated, much effort was put
into manufacturing and stockpiling the weapons so that they would be ready if
needed. The first chemical weapon plant had been opened in April
1944 at Warners, New York state, initially producing about eighty tons of
poison gas a week. This was later increased to over 400 tons a week, and more
plants were built so that by 1945 the US army had over fifty million chemical
artillery shells and the US army air corps had more than a million bombs and
100,000 aircraft spray tanks. The dropping of the atom
bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains controversial to this day. The fact
that many more atom bombs would have been used against Japanese cities if the
imperial government had not surrendered when it did indicates the determination
of the US leadership to end the war with the lowest possible American casualties,
whatever happened in Japan. If the Manhattan
Project had not succeeded in producing "Little Boy" and "Fat
Man", then "Plan B" was waiting in the wings, potentially capable
of killing even more people than died in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, or the firebombing
of Tokyo.
|